The Volokh Conspiracy

Heroes and Cowards:

I'm delighted to report that Profs. Dora Costa and Matthew Kahn from the UCLA Economics Department will be guest-blogging next week about their new book, Heroes and Cowards: The Social Face of War. The book looks fascinating, and has gotten accolades from some top people both in military history (for instance, James McPherson, author of Battle Cry of Freedom) and in the social science of social relationships (for instance, Robert Putnam, author of Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community). "This remarkable book is destined to become a classic in social science," writes Putnam, who certainly knows things about classics in social science. "It addresses issues of supreme importance and timeliness -- loyalty, betrayal, heroism, cowardice, survival, the challenges of diversity, and the benefits of social bonds. It rests on rigorous statistical analysis of an extraordinary historical archive, and yet it is so readable as to be unputdownable. It deals with a single epochal event in one nation's history -- the U.S. Civil War -- and yet its lessons are highly relevant in many other eras and societies, including our own."

Here's a brief summary to get you an idea of the coming week:

When are people willing to sacrifice for the common good? What are the benefits of friendship? How do communities deal with betrayal? And what are the costs and benefits of being in a diverse community? Using the life histories of more than forty thousand Civil War soldiers, Dora Costa and Matthew Kahn answer these questions and uncover the vivid stories, social influences, and crucial networks that influenced soldiers' lives both during and after the war.

Drawing information from government documents, soldiers' journals, and one of the most extensive research projects about Union Army soldiers ever undertaken, Heroes and Cowards demonstrates the role that social capital plays in people's decisions. The makeup of various companies -- whether soldiers were of the same ethnicity, age, and occupation -- influenced whether soldiers remained loyal or whether they deserted. Costa and Kahn discuss how the soldiers benefited from friendships, what social factors allowed some to survive the POW camps while others died, and how punishments meted out for breaking codes of conduct affected men after the war. The book also examines the experience of African-American soldiers and makes important observations about how their comrades shaped their lives. Heroes and Cowards highlights the inherent tensions between the costs and benefits of community diversity, shedding light on how groups and societies behave and providing valuable lessons for the present day.

Kevin Forrester (mail) (www):
As a member of the Sons of Union Veterans of the Civil War, I'm looking forward to it!
1.10.2009 1:10am
Richard Aubrey (mail):
I believe there has been some work on the subject currently. One finding is that the more social diversity there is in a community, the less trust there is. It would seem unexceptional, except that we are all supposed to be all tolerant and pc and what not. Turns out that it's not the way it happens. Real world hits wishful thinking. Again.
Reading Dennis Smith's "Report from Ground Zero" which is full of examples.
Tom Wolfe, in Bonfire of The Vanities, said that if you're not Irish when you become a cop or firefighter in NYC, you become Irish real fast. Increases social trust, I suppose.
Problem with recruiting locally is that a day which is all quiet (with minor exceptions) on whatever front as far as the army is concerned could still be a very bad day for some township in the middle of noplace.
An area in the Maritimes raised an Infantry battalion for WW I and lost about eighty percent of them before breakfast one fine day. Horrible social consequences at home.
In WW II, they raised an artillery battalion. As one writer observed, "they'd tried Infantry".
1.10.2009 9:51am
Assistant Village Idiot (mail) (www):
"Unputdownable?" Ecchh.
1.12.2009 8:46am
Dan Hamilton:
They are studing the Union and using them for their data.

Will they try and go from Union to everybody?

The society of the North and the South was very different.

They would need to work up data on a number of different societies to come to some conclusion.

There should be as much information on the South as the North for the War of Northern Agression. Why didn't they use both and contrast the social differences, if any? It would seem to make for a much better work.

Or is it more of the North thinking that only they count.
1.12.2009 12:47pm

Post as: [Register] [Log In]

Account:
Password:
Remember info?

If you have a comment about spelling, typos, or format errors, please e-mail the poster directly rather than posting a comment.

Comment Policy: We reserve the right to edit or delete comments, and in extreme cases to ban commenters, at our discretion. Comments must be relevant and civil (and, especially, free of name-calling). We think of comment threads like dinner parties at our homes. If you make the party unpleasant for us or for others, we'd rather you went elsewhere. We're happy to see a wide range of viewpoints, but we want all of them to be expressed as politely as possible.

We realize that such a comment policy can never be evenly enforced, because we can't possibly monitor every comment equally well. Hundreds of comments are posted every day here, and we don't read them all. Those we read, we read with different degrees of attention, and in different moods. We try to be fair, but we make no promises.

And remember, it's a big Internet. If you think we were mistaken in removing your post (or, in extreme cases, in removing you) -- or if you prefer a more free-for-all approach -- there are surely plenty of ways you can still get your views out.